Hi,
The hardware is a wireless router but the conundrum is around wired WAN <-> LAN performance hence I'm posting it here.
The Netgear R6300v2 was flashed with Tomato firmware and I had benchmarked it's NAT routing performance at around 800Mbps using iperf3 over Gigabit interfaces before deploying it as a gateway router with a measly 50/5 plan from Comcast/Xfinity. That benchmark is in the ballpark of what an old router chart on SNB shows.
This weekend, I updated it to a 600/15 plan and noticed that wired Gigabit devices on the LAN are only seeing sub-300Mbps download speeds when pointed to speedtest.xfinity.com whereas I do see 600 when connected directly to the modem.
Is iperf3 not representative of whatever these browser based speed tests do? Anything else to try before investing in a router with a faster SOC?
Thaks
The hardware is a wireless router but the conundrum is around wired WAN <-> LAN performance hence I'm posting it here.
The Netgear R6300v2 was flashed with Tomato firmware and I had benchmarked it's NAT routing performance at around 800Mbps using iperf3 over Gigabit interfaces before deploying it as a gateway router with a measly 50/5 plan from Comcast/Xfinity. That benchmark is in the ballpark of what an old router chart on SNB shows.
This weekend, I updated it to a 600/15 plan and noticed that wired Gigabit devices on the LAN are only seeing sub-300Mbps download speeds when pointed to speedtest.xfinity.com whereas I do see 600 when connected directly to the modem.
Is iperf3 not representative of whatever these browser based speed tests do? Anything else to try before investing in a router with a faster SOC?
Thaks