Howard_inGA
Senior Member
Ditto!!!Has been working now for over 10 days without the slightest hiccup:
View attachment 67360
GREAT WORK @RMerlin !
Ditto!!!Has been working now for over 10 days without the slightest hiccup:
View attachment 67360
GREAT WORK @RMerlin !
+1Has been working now for over 10 days without the slightest hiccup:
View attachment 67360
GREAT WORK @RMerlin !
I don't know as I don't pay attention to it. If Asus did any change, they are generally forward-compatible. When they aren't, they get converted on the first boot, in code located in rc/format.c.custom_clientlist
dhcp_staticlist
qos_rulelist
Notification Center. That's an internal service that Asus uses with their mobile application, possibly with other services.Also what does file nc_setting_conf used for?
The factory default reset must be done after the upgrade, not before. You want any new default settings to be from the new firmware.I am planning to upgrade from 3004.388.8_4 to 3006-102-5, so i just first factory reset via GUI then load the new firmware and configure all setting from scratch? Anything else I should be concerned of?
Aug 15 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8818)]fw_version report is not exist.
Aug 15 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8836)]final_fw_ver_obj = [null]
Aug 15 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8952)]No need to send new fw event
Aug 15 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8818)]fw_version report is not exist.
Aug 15 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8836)]final_fw_ver_obj = [null]
Aug 15 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8952)]No need to send new fw event
No. The old Merlin-specific LED handling has been removed, and replaced with the Asus LED handling, to avoid duplicate code, and also ensure compatibility with AiMesh LED control.This does not work in new version?
nvram set led_disable=1
service restart_leds
I dont see led's getting disabled. Any alternative way to enable/disable via command line?
That notification isn't about the firmware having checked for a new firmware, it's about whether it should notify you (through the mobile app I suppose) if there is one.@Marlin
Whats the reason for this coming up over and over in the logs:
Code:Aug 15 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8818)]fw_version report is not exist. Aug 15 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8836)]final_fw_ver_obj = [null] Aug 15 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8952)]No need to send new fw event Aug 15 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8818)]fw_version report is not exist. Aug 15 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8836)]final_fw_ver_obj = [null] Aug 15 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8952)]No need to send new fw event
Never had this come up in any of the other releases, and I haven't changed nothing.
Scheduled check for new firmware availability: set to NO
You were right in the new 3.0.0.6.102_38961 firmware it was removed the options.Didn't notice before, but you're right, they are missing. May be they realized it didn't work anyway![]()
All good here. One little thing is my wireless Canon printer doesn't show it's name in the wireless log. It does show up everywhere else including arp -a. The printer is up to date with the latest drivers so not sure if it's a Canon thing or not but it's not a big deal as everything works just fine.
That’s a limitation of AP mode. The name info is usually on the router, not an AP.setting up the router from scratch
In addition to @dave14305, if the clients MAC are set to private most clients nowadays, it'll will not show the names, hence private. Maybe if you set a static IP for all real MAC's of each Client then it would.That’s a limitation of AP mode. The name info is usually on the router, not an AP.
Try a longer or better shielded USB cable.Hey. Running 102.5 on AXE16000. Every time I connect any SSD to USB 2.0 port the aimesh wireless backhaul drops dramatically in speed and 1x node complete goes offline. Rebooting all the routers does not help. Not using any QOS, no SD VLANs. Disconnect USB drive & it all comes back to normal. Checked both SSDs - both of them are fine, no errors, etc. Any ideas?
Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: Error locking /var/lock//usr/networkmap/nmp_conv_type.js.lock: 2 No such file or directory
Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: Error unlocking -1: 9 Bad file descriptor
Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: Error locking /var/lock//usr/networkmap/nmp_vendor_type.js.lock: 2 No such file or directory
Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: Error unlocking -1: 9 Bad file descriptor
Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: Error locking /var/lock//usr/networkmap/nmp_bwdpi_type.js.lock: 2 No such file or directory
Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: Error unlocking -1: 9 Bad file descriptor
Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: start scan...
It means theHi,
What's the reason for this coming up in the logs (RT-BE88U running 3006.102.5)?
Code:Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: Error locking /var/lock//usr/networkmap/nmp_conv_type.js.lock: 2 No such file or directory Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: Error unlocking -1: 9 Bad file descriptor Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: Error locking /var/lock//usr/networkmap/nmp_vendor_type.js.lock: 2 No such file or directory Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: Error unlocking -1: 9 Bad file descriptor Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: Error locking /var/lock//usr/networkmap/nmp_bwdpi_type.js.lock: 2 No such file or directory Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: Error unlocking -1: 9 Bad file descriptor Aug 19 11:58:52 RT-BE88U-37A0 networkmap: start scan...
networkmap
process was restarted. That can happen for all sorts of reasons, usually because some change was made to the router's configuration.That notification isn't about the firmware having checked for a new firmware, it's about whether it should notify you (through the mobile app I suppose) if there is one.
If it does repeat itself every 30 seconds then it's probably because it requires a version check to have happened at least once. That might be a side-effect of now allowing new firmware checks to be completely disabled, in which case the only solution for now is to manually run one check, and see if it satisfies the notification task.
Aug 16 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8818)]fw_version report is not exist.
Aug 16 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8836)]final_fw_ver_obj = [null]
Aug 16 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8952)]No need to send new fw event
Aug 16 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8818)]fw_version report is not exist.
Aug 16 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8836)]final_fw_ver_obj = [null]
Aug 16 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8952)]No need to send new fw event
Aug 17 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8818)]fw_version report is not exist.
Aug 17 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8836)]final_fw_ver_obj = [null]
Aug 17 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8952)]No need to send new fw event
Aug 17 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8818)]fw_version report is not exist.
Aug 17 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8836)]final_fw_ver_obj = [null]
Aug 17 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8952)]No need to send new fw event
Aug 18 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8818)]fw_version report is not exist.
Aug 18 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8836)]final_fw_ver_obj = [null]
Aug 18 18:36:12 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8952)]No need to send new fw event
Aug 18 18:36:34 kernel: SBF: dhd0: INIT [a2:b4:b5:63:c6:4e] ID 65535 BFW 65535 THRSH 2048
Aug 18 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8818)]fw_version report is not exist.
Aug 18 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8836)]final_fw_ver_obj = [null]
Aug 18 18:36:42 WATCHDOG: [NOTI_NEW_FW_AVAIL][noti_new_fw_available:(8952)]No need to send new fw event
That`s not what I wrote.Crazy that Asus requires people to install their app on the phone just to get rid of this log message.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!