What's new

Skynet Skynet v8 - Router Firewall & Security Enhancements

@Adamm Thanks so much for all the work you do and this great release! I did not mean anything harsh by my previous comment on 'testing before a production release'. I was just 'surprised' when the update happened although I had auto-updates disabled. All is good now.
BTW, I have been using skynet for years! I know some people say it may be 'overkill', but I to me, it does not hurt performance and it adds another layer, where to me, it may in fact prevent dns dos (argumentative). I do not catch many outbound blocks, but when I have, it is well worth it. I also only use active block lists, with a conservative approach to block the real bad guys with minimizing false-positives. These include spamhaus, feodo, dshield, ponmocup (although no longer maintained) and stamparm ip level 5.
 
I guess this is the heart of the problem. The wan interface name is part of the Skynet rules, and yours seems to start as eth0 then change to wan0. Never seen that before.
I'm guessing?? because I'm translating packets via router & not the ONT, router is using Residential Gateway mode, hence wan0?

Dec 31 18:01:13 kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
Dec 31 18:01:13 kernel: netdev path : wan0 -> eth0
Dec 31 18:01:13 kernel: BCMVLAN : eth0 mode was set to RG
Dec 31 18:01:13 kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wan0: link is not ready
Dec 31 18:01:13 kernel: VLAN Rule Table : eth0, Rx, nbrOfTags 1, default DROP

@Adamm, do you see a workaround?
 
Last edited:

Latest threads

Support SNBForums w/ Amazon

If you'd like to support SNBForums, just use this link and buy anything on Amazon. Thanks!

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Back
Top