hi,
I have multiple AC68U flashed with the latest Merlin 386.1; All nodes are on wired backhaul and I have noticed this phenomenon both with AsusWRT and Merlin.
I have multiple wireless clients that are stationary with clear line-of-sight to AiMesh node. As an example, I have both a AiMesh node and an Amazon Echo in a guest bedroom, and the linear distance between these two are 9 feet at the most, with line-of-sight. Yet, the Amazon Echo insists on connecting to a different AiMesh node on a different floor.
If I tried to bind the Amazon Echo to the node in the same room, I would get a warning that:
"due to the current weak connection, your <device name> might lose its internet connection. Are you sure you want to proceed?"
I am just curious as to why the AiMesh node in the room would have "weaker" connection? After flashing All AC68U to Merlin 386.1, I manually set up the AiMesh network from scratch: all devices were reset/re-initialized after flashing. The only customization I did was port-forwarding and static DHCP table/IP.
any thoughts?
I have multiple AC68U flashed with the latest Merlin 386.1; All nodes are on wired backhaul and I have noticed this phenomenon both with AsusWRT and Merlin.
I have multiple wireless clients that are stationary with clear line-of-sight to AiMesh node. As an example, I have both a AiMesh node and an Amazon Echo in a guest bedroom, and the linear distance between these two are 9 feet at the most, with line-of-sight. Yet, the Amazon Echo insists on connecting to a different AiMesh node on a different floor.
If I tried to bind the Amazon Echo to the node in the same room, I would get a warning that:
"due to the current weak connection, your <device name> might lose its internet connection. Are you sure you want to proceed?"
I am just curious as to why the AiMesh node in the room would have "weaker" connection? After flashing All AC68U to Merlin 386.1, I manually set up the AiMesh network from scratch: all devices were reset/re-initialized after flashing. The only customization I did was port-forwarding and static DHCP table/IP.
any thoughts?