What's new
  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

Good day to all!)
I checked by putty amtm command and there is no more Diversion installed on my asus rt-ac5300. It looks like it was accidentally self-uninstalled. Ok, i checked "1" - install and then clicked yes and it showed me info that my rt-ac5300 is not supported by diversion, and then Diversion installation failed.
It looks like something went wrong. But i remembered that few weeks ago i updated Diverion to new version and it was ok.
What to check and how to fix that?

Pixelsrv-tls is also not online by ip addres it was designated to.
 
Last edited:
UPDATE: This issue is not related to Diversion and can be ignored.
@Treadler it is indeed related to AI Mesh. Thank you so much.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Hello,

I'm going to post this in here as the issue I'm having here:

Seems to be related to the running of Diversion (possibly just dnsmasq)

Code:
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U Diversion: is disabled, no services started
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U stubby[17043]: Read config from file /etc/stubby/stubby.yml
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: started, version 2.82-34-gb309cca cachesize 1500
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-RTC no-DBus no-UBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack ipset no-auth DNSSEC no-ID loop-detect no-inotify no-dumpfile
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: DNSSEC validation enabled
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: configured with trust anchor for <root> keytag 20326
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: warning: interface pptp* does not currently exist
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: asynchronous logging enabled, queue limit is 5 messages
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq-dhcp[17054]: DHCP, IP range 10.8.1.100 -- 10.8.1.199, lease time 1d
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: read /etc/ hosts - 6 addresses
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: read /etc/ hosts.dnsmasq - 0 addresses
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: using nameserver 127.0.1.1#53
Sep 30 09:02:33 RT-AC86U amas_lib[1393]: Error locking /var/lock/amas_node_list.lock: 0 Already locked
Sep 30 09:02:33 RT-AC86U amas_lib[1393]: Error unlocking -1: 9 Bad file descriptor
Sep 30 09:02:35 RT-AC86U Diversion: diversion.conf file not found, not starting pixelserv-tls

I keep getting this error pop up in my log

Code:
Sep 30 09:02:33 RT-AC86U amas_lib[1393]: Error locking /var/lock/amas_node_list.lock: 0 Already locked
Sep 30 09:02:33 RT-AC86U amas_lib[1393]: Error unlocking -1: 9 Bad file descriptor

But every time it appears its at the same time diversion is printing stuff to the log.

Does anyone have any idea? I apologise if this is not Diversion related and will remove the post if that's the case.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Hello,

I'm going to post this in here as the issue I'm having here:

Seems to be related to the running of Diversion (possibly just dnsmasq)

Code:
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U Diversion: is disabled, no services started
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U stubby[17043]: Read config from file /etc/stubby/stubby.yml
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: started, version 2.82-34-gb309cca cachesize 1500
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-RTC no-DBus no-UBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack ipset no-auth DNSSEC no-ID loop-detect no-inotify no-dumpfile
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: DNSSEC validation enabled
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: configured with trust anchor for <root> keytag 20326
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: warning: interface pptp* does not currently exist
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: asynchronous logging enabled, queue limit is 5 messages
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq-dhcp[17054]: DHCP, IP range 10.8.1.100 -- 10.8.1.199, lease time 1d
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: read /etc/ hosts - 6 addresses
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: read /etc/ hosts.dnsmasq - 0 addresses
Sep 30 09:02:32 RT-AC86U dnsmasq[17054]: using nameserver 127.0.1.1#53
Sep 30 09:02:33 RT-AC86U amas_lib[1393]: Error locking /var/lock/amas_node_list.lock: 0 Already locked
Sep 30 09:02:33 RT-AC86U amas_lib[1393]: Error unlocking -1: 9 Bad file descriptor
Sep 30 09:02:35 RT-AC86U Diversion: diversion.conf file not found, not starting pixelserv-tls

I keep getting this error pop up in my log

Code:
Sep 30 09:02:33 RT-AC86U amas_lib[1393]: Error locking /var/lock/amas_node_list.lock: 0 Already locked
Sep 30 09:02:33 RT-AC86U amas_lib[1393]: Error unlocking -1: 9 Bad file descriptor

But every time it appears its at the same time diversion is printing stuff to the log.

Does anyone have any idea? I apologise if this is not Diversion related and will remove the post if that's the case.

Thanks in advance.

Im not sure. ‘Amas’ though is something to do with AiMesh AFAIK.
 
Good day to all!)
I checked by putty amtm command and there is no more Diversion installed on my asus rt-ac5300. It looks like it was accidentally self-uninstalled. Ok, i checked "1" - install and then clicked yes and it showed me info that my rt-ac5300 is not supported by diversion, and then Diversion installation failed.
It looks like something went wrong. But i remembered that few weeks ago i updated Diverion to new version and it was ok.
What to check and how to fix that?

Pixelsrv-tls is also not online by ip addres it was designated to.
you may have a corrupt usb device or your jffs may need reformatting/re-configuring. The only time i have seen diversion go missing is if it is not properly starting or there is some sort of corruption.
 
Just curious are there any plans for the WebGUI tab beyond what it is now? Also I assume the 2 test tabs are just that and don't actually have any purpose? Thanks...
 
Just curious are there any plans for the WebGUI tab beyond what it is now? Also I assume the 2 test tabs are just that and don't actually have any purpose? Thanks...

I, too, was wondering about the 2 test buttons...
 
Just curious are there any plans for the WebGUI tab beyond what it is now? Also I assume the 2 test tabs are just that and don't actually have any purpose? Thanks...
You are correct on the purpose of the test tabs. The fully functional and complete Diversion WebUI will be available when it's done.
 
You are correct on the purpose of the test tabs. The fully functional and complete Diversion WebUI will be available when it's done.
I can't wait. :Do_Oo_O:cool:. Keep us in suspense.
 
Thanks for the info. I hope you did not take my inquiry as an ask about 'when will it be done'. I was only asking so that I could decide if I wanted to keep the option enable in anticipation of an update when it is done OR disable it as it is what it is and will be nothing more. :)
 
I had to completely remove it. For what ever reason, it would after a day or so peg the CPU's at 100% and eat all the memory on my RT-ac68. Reboot all is good for 24 - 48 hours. But oddly this never surfaced until I upgraded to fiber.
 
Thanks for the info. I hope you did not take my inquiry as an ask about 'when will it be done'. I was only asking so that I could decide if I wanted to keep the option enable in anticipation of an update when it is done OR disable it as it is what it is and will be nothing more. :)
It's all good man.
 
I had to completely remove it. For what ever reason, it would after a day or so peg the CPU's at 100% and eat all the memory on my RT-ac68. Reboot all is good for 24 - 48 hours. But oddly this never surfaced until I upgraded to fiber.
"It" being what?
 
You are correct on the purpose of the test tabs. The fully functional and complete Diversion WebUI will be available when it's done.
Yeah, how is your WebUI coming along?
 
This sounds more like a USB drive problem than a Diversion issue. You probably have some bad blocks on your USB drive.
I am not 99% sure. I have done everything and anything including uninstalling WebUI foe Diversion, Skynet and format the drive to catch any bad blocks. However what I did notice if I install uiDivStats it seems to send the CPU up about 10% and memory use up 25%. It pegs CPU from time to time then drops to run around 25% with it not installed CPU usage is about the 3% and Memory is normal around 100mb used. Shown is without uiDevStats. Going to let it run for the next couple days. Then install uiDivStats
1601646156306.png
 
I am not 99% sure. I have done everything and anything including uninstalling WebUI foe Diversion, Skynet and format the drive to catch any bad blocks. However what I did notice if I install uiDivStats it seems to send the CPU up about 10% and memory use up 25%. It pegs CPU from time to time then drops to run around 25% with it not installed CPU usage is about the 3% and Memory is normal around 100mb used. Shown is without uiDevStats. Going to let it run for the next couple days. Then install uiDivStats
View attachment 26628
uiDivStats is different and created by @Jack Yaz. Have a look at that forum for your issue. Alot of people (myself included) had that same issue but resolved it by either uninstalling it or getting a faster usb drive.
 
So my usb drive just died and I bought a new one. Installer entware and everything is fine. But diversion is causing my dns to not work. I have a DoT setup from Merlin wan settings. It used to work fine but now it won't work. Everytime diversion is enabled. I can't do any dns request from my devices. Also tried reinstalling diversion with the clean option. Also tried removing both SkyNet and diversion, then installing both clean again. Same thing. Any ideas?

Also on diversion install it always said waiting for dnsmasq and timing out. For some reasons.

For info I'm using AC86U on .19 . Should be fine since it used to be fine, but after this new clean install it just won't work
 
If the 'clean install' didn't include 'Format the JFFS partition on the next boot', it was not a clean install. :)

What steps were done specifically with the new USB drive and 'clean install'?
 

Latest threads

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Top